Right now, the U.S. simply doesn’t have a way to protect against missile attacks targeting the homeland, at least not without triggering “mutually assured extinction” of the human race. It’s the core argument for building the Golden Dome missile shield but one that is sometimes glossed over.

Sen. Deb Fischer, Nebraska Republican and chair of the powerful Senate Armed Services strategic forces subcommittee, underlined that basic yet crucial point during a panel discussion Monday at the Air, Space and Cyber Conference at National Harbor in Oxon Hill, Maryland. Threat Status is on the ground at the event this week and has more coverage of what has been a news-packed summit so far.

Space Force Gen. Michael A. Guetlein, the Trump administration’s Golden Dome director, said the project is on track to deliver an “operational capability” by 2028. That’s important, because as Ms. Fischer said, America’s only current options for dealing with modern missile threats aren’t enough.

“Sure, we can defend against a massive strategic attack on this country. We can deter it. That’s our defense. We can deter it, and that’s through mutually assured extinction,” she said.

The Defense Department announced a $450 million equity investment in the Maine-based Elmet Group, which produces tungsten, a chemical used to make armor-piercing ammunition and missile components.

It’s at least the sixth direct equity investment the Pentagon has made in a private defense or critical materials company. It’s a controversial strategy, as some analysts question the legal basis for the moves and a growing number of Republicans warn it will have long-term, anti-competitive repercussions for the U.S. defense industry.

In the case of the Elmet Group, the Pentagon is banking on the company to help unwind communist China’s chokehold on the global tungsten market. Specialists say Beijing cornered the tungsten sector in the 1980s by undercutting Western producers through low-cost production driven by subsidies, cheaper labor and lighter regulations, forcing competitors to close. China now controls more than 80% of the global output, according to U.S. Geological Survey data.

There’s a growing public and political backlash against AI, but key military leaders say the U.S. must move faster to implement the technology.

National Security Correspondent Bill Gertz unpacks a sweeping speech recently from Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Gen. Caine told an audience at a National Defense Industrial Association conference that ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East provide valuable military lessons, especially regarding drone warfare and the need to rapidly develop new autonomous warfare capabilities.

The military is quickly adopting autonomous weapons. Gen. Caine said younger troops are more easily attuned to using digital systems, while older war fighters are being trained on the use of air, sea and underwater AI-powered drones.

“We’re in a confidence-building phase right now across the joint force” on autonomous warfare, he said.

The U.S. has been in direct contact with the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, even as the rebel group consolidates its control over the country’s western coastline and deepens its influence over the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

That revelation from Vice President J.D. Vance on Monday signals that the Trump administration aims to use diplomacy, rather than immediately ramping up military action, to deal with an increasingly complex, dangerous situation. Foreign Affairs Correspondent Vaughn Cockayne is tracking all of the developments in the region, where escalated fighting between Saudi-backed government forces and Houthi rebels in Yemen threatens commercial shipping in the Red Sea and has caused a massive spike in oil prices.

On Monday, Houthi forces captured the Greater and Lesser Hanish islands, two small islands in the southern Red Sea, north of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Saudi forces reportedly launched a new round of airstrikes targeting the Houthis on Tuesday.

What happens if the Chinese Communist Party, the supreme ruling body atop America’s leading great power rival, suddenly collapses?

Threat Status contributor Miles Yu tackles that high-stakes question in a new Red Horizon column for The Washington Times and makes the case that U.S. decision-makers must begin preparing for that possibility, however difficult to imagine it seems right now. 

He argues that Washington and its allies around the world have a vested interest in preventing the potential collapse of Communist rule in China from producing civil war, nuclear proliferation, economic catastrophe, ethnic violence or another dictatorship.

“Plans should exist for securing strategic weapons, stabilizing financial markets, maintaining essential services, protecting archives, preventing mass reprisals, dismantling political police organizations, separating the military from the CCP, establishing legitimate privatization procedures, recovering stolen public assets, creating truth-and-reconciliation mechanisms and helping Chinese citizens construct a constitutional order,” writes Mr. Yu, director of the China Center at the Hudson Institute.

• Sept. 15 — Sen. Pete Ricketts, Nebraska Republican, on the Next Phase of Competition with China, Hudson Institute

• Sept. 15-16 — AFA National Convention, Air & Space Forces Association

• Sept. 16 — The Transatlantic Watchtower: Iceland’s Role in Great Power Competition, Hudson Institute

• Sept. 17 — AUKUS at Five: Progress, Challenges and the Way Forward, Center for Strategic & International Studies

• Sept. 17 — A Conversation with Undersecretary of State Jacob Helberg on Securing America’s AI Supply Chain, American Enterprise Institute

• Sept. 22-23 — Nuclear Energy Policy Summit 2026, Atlantic Council

• Sept. 24 — 2026 Intel Summit, Potomac Officers Club

• Oct. 12-14 — AUSA Annual Meeting & Expo, Association of the U.S. Army