A version of this story appeared in the daily Threat Status newsletter from The Washington Times. Click here to receive Threat Status delivered directly to your inbox each weekday.
The High-Level Week of the annual United Nations General Assembly is one of the most important tone-setting events for international diplomacy, and the U.S. is entering it under starkly different circumstances than last year.
An expanding crisis in the Middle East that threatens international energy prices, an ambitious U.S. policy push in South America and growing concerns over artificial intelligence are just a few of the key issues facing Trump administration officials in New York.
Brazil will kick off the conference’s weeklong General Debate session Tuesday, but Mr. Trump’s speech is likely to set the tone for the rest of the summit.
People were interested in these podcasts
Last year, Mr. Trump’s speech focused on mass immigration, downplaying the effects of human-made climate change and blasting the United Nations as a useless organization.
Still, Iran and Venezuela played important supporting roles in his remarks last year. He reiterated that the U.S. considers Iran the “world’s No. 1 sponsor of terror” and cast U.S. airstrikes on Tehran’s nuclear sites in June 2025 as a clear victory.
Mr. Trump also promoted the use of the U.S. military to strike small boats allegedly trafficking illicit drugs in the Caribbean, casting the operation as just one component of the effort to topple Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro.
Both situations look different a year later, with Iran now at the center of an escalating Middle East crisis and Mr. Maduro imprisoned in the United States.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Mr. Trump’s most prominent foreign policy champion, is likely to be front and center this week, touting U.S. achievements over the past year and convening bilateral meetings with foreign leaders on the sidelines.
Mr. Rubio will also advocate that the United Nations “return to its core mandate of maintaining international peace and security while respecting national sovereignty,” according to a statement from the State Department.
Another Middle East war
In his remarks last year, Mr. Trump implied that the conflict with Iran was effectively over after the U.S. and Israel launched joint attacks on uranium enrichment facilities in June.
However, the ongoing war, which Mr. Trump launched with Israel in February, has become a far-reaching crisis affecting nations in the Middle East and beyond, displacing thousands and killing 18 U.S. service members.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and his delegation are confirmed to attend the summit this year, the State Department said Thursday, but Iran’s delegation is smaller than last year and officials will “face prohibitions on the purchase of luxury and other goods.”
It remains unclear whether U.S. officials will meet with the Iranian delegation or discuss peace proposals via mediating countries, such as Pakistan or Qatar, which will be present at the General Assembly.
Last year, Mr. Trump and his delegation met with key Arab and Islamic leaders on the sidelines of the conference. That meeting laid the groundwork for the peace plan for the Gaza Strip, facilitated by the Board of Peace, which Mr. Trump chairs and which was established under the 20-point plan he announced in September 2025.
Still, even if U.S. officials meet with mediators at the United Nations this week, Iranian officials have increasingly signaled that they are not open to peace negotiations until the U.S. removes its naval blockade, eases sanctions and withdraws its military from the region.
Post-Maduro Venezuela
Mr. Rubio, who has been the face of the Trump administration’s focus on the Western Hemisphere, will enter the U.N. General Assembly nine months after the U.S. facilitated Mr. Maduro’s removal and as Washington gains more influence over the country’s development.
The summit is also being held after the announcement of a landmark U.S.-Venezuela oil deal that would give Washington unprecedented control over Venezuela’s oil reserves.
The agreement, announced by the White House this month and brokered by the departments of State and Defense, gives the U.S. government a stake in North American Blue Energy Partners, Venezuela’s second-largest private oil producer, run by Venezuelan businessman Alejandro Betancourt, to develop 17 Venezuelan oil fields holding a proven 65 billion barrels of reserves.
Venezuela’s government has granted the company 100-year operating rights over the fields, and Mr. Betancourt has committed to a $100 billion investment in oil infrastructure.
The Department of Defense’s Office of Strategic Capital holds a 35% equity stake in NABEP’s corporate parent, at no cost to U.S. taxpayers, while the State Department has secured the right to purchase 20% of the company’s output at cost, plus first refusal on the remaining 80%. The official text of the deal has not been released publicly.
U.S. officials have insisted that the deal will pave the way for democracy to flourish in Venezuela, but Mr. Rubio and Mr. Trump are likely to face accusations of imperialism at the U.N. conference, as concerns grow about when the first post-Maduro elections will be held.
Interim Venezuelan President Delcy Rodriguez, who has been an outwardly enthusiastic partner of U.S. efforts in the country, is expected to attend the General Assembly. The State Department has not confirmed whether Mr. Rubio will meet with Ms. Rodriguez.
AI fears
The assembly is also the first since the two major U.N. artificial intelligence mechanisms, the Independent Scientific Panel and the Global Dialogue on AI Governance, began operations this year.
AI-powered autonomous weapons systems have been a particular concern for outgoing U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who set 2026 as the deadline for member states to create an instrument to bind weapons systems that can act without human oversight.
“Machines selecting and engaging their target and taking a life, without human control and judgment, that is morally repugnant,” Mr. Guterres said in July at the U.N. Global Dialogue on AI Governance in Geneva. “It is politically unacceptable. And it must be banned by international law.”
Yet Mr. Guterres’ push for global regulation on AI technology is likely to continue to face fierce opposition from U.S. representatives.
The U.S. was one of two dissenting votes during the Scientific Panel’s vote to appoint the 40-member commission in February, siding with Paraguay. Lauren Lovelace, the U.S. Mission’s counselor, called the panel a massive “overreach” of the U.N. mandate and declared that the organization does not have a say on global AI governance.
The divide sharpened the week before High-Level Week at the General Assembly after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay this month warning about the potential for AI models to cause catastrophic damage to global systems.
Mr. Amodei pointed to a July incident in which a swarm of OpenAI autonomous agents breached their testing environment and operated undetected for approximately a week. He added that although this case was relatively harmless, a similar swarm could become capable of taking over the entire internet within six to 12 months, causing hundreds of billions of dollars in damage.
Despite the clamor surrounding the essay on Capitol Hill and in Silicon Valley, Mr. Trump dismissed Mr. Amodei’s concerns as a “sick conspiracy” and called AI safety concerns a “hoax.”
The disconnect between the fears of some in the industry and Mr. Trump’s response underscores one of the primary tensions that could resurface this week at the General Assembly: U.N. leaders want comprehensive guardrails, while the Trump administration seems dedicated to maintaining U.S. dominance in the space.
Contact the author
Please read our comment policy before commenting.