OPINION:
Just in time for Father’s Day and the traditional month of weddings, the New York State Legislature passed a bill to get rid of the terms “father” and “mother” in family court proceedings.
Now, dad will be the “non-gestating parent” and mom will be “gestating parent.”
How heartwarming is that? Can’t you just see the new, improved Hallmark cards?
It is quite a step down for Dad, who gets defined only by a negative.
Unfortunately, this proposed law is not a Babylon Bee satire. It is the work of an increasingly certifiable Democratic Party that is taking a sledgehammer to what remains of our moral foundations.
In the state Senate, which passed the bill June 2, all Democrats except three voted for the lunacy. Two opted out, and Rep. James Skoufis of the Hudson Valley was the lone Democrat voting no. (Bully for him, although I cannot imagine what “presents” the LGBTQ tolerance police will leave on his doorstep, on his voicemail and at his office.)
In the state Assembly, the measure passed on a 91-46 vote, with 86 Democrats and five Republicans voting yes. Nine Democrats voted no, and nine were absent. Of the 46 Republicans, 37 voted no, five voted yes, and four were absent.
That makes nine Republicans who refused to stand up for sanity.
Gov. Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, has been coy, refusing to say whether she will sign or veto the bill. It might depend on how much she cares whether she and her state become even more of a punchline than they already are.
Right now, the spotlight is on Maine’s Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate, Graham Platner, best known for his Nazi tattoo, sexting, roughness with women and communist ideology. Remember when Maine was famous for lobster, pine trees, lakes and teeth-rattling nor’easters?
Then there is Texas, where Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico has referred to women as “neighbors with a uterus.”
For people at war with biology, the Democrats sure seem obsessed with identities based on bodily functions.
Meanwhile, the New York state Republican leadership, fearful of anything that might annoy LGBTQ activists, went into a familiar crouch over the “gestating” bill.
In a Fox News interview, New York Minority Leader Edward Ra seemed to complain only that it did not involve money. “We don’t think it does anything to make New York more affordable on a permanent basis, and that’s what New Yorkers are talking about, that’s what they care about,” he said. “They want to know what we’re doing to make their lives more affordable.”
Well, undermining nuclear, married families makes everything more expensive. For example, trillions of tax dollars have been spent on welfare and crime since the 1960s, when the Democrats’ Great Society began paying women to have babies out of wedlock.
Along the same lines as Mr. Ra, New York Conservative Party Chairman Gerard Kassar criticized the measure as “an unnecessary and wasteful use of time.”
Providing some moral gravity, Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman, the Nassau County executive, let the Democrats have it in a social media post reported in The Washington Times.
“In Kathy Hochul’s New York, ‘mom’ is now defined as ‘gestating parent,’” Mr. Blakeman wrote. “Not when I’m Governor! I’ll stand up for moms and dads against this insanity.”
Speaking of dads, they have received lousy press in recent years. A front-page Washington Post article on June 7 was headlined: “No letup in pace of domestic killings: Three fathers slay families in a week.”
Wow. Better keep clear of Dad. The Post article features studies showing an alarming increase in “family and intimate-partner killings.” As usual, the article does not distinguish between married and unmarried killers and victims. Yet, according to the FBI, “unmarried/cohabiting/dating partners” are responsible for about 55% of intimate partner homicides, while spouses account for only 45%, even though of the nation’s 80 million U.S. households, 58 million are married-couple households.
It is hard to find crime report figures that distinguish between married and cohabiting perps and victims. The government stopped highlighting that parameter, just as it stopped making it easy to find data on LGBTQ intimate partner violence.
I have a theory: Sheer numbers make the case that women and men in married households are far less likely to be perpetrators or victims of violence. This goes against woke ideology, which says marriage is either regressive, unimportant or infinitely open to redefinition.
In his book “What Really Matters,” Focus on the Family Vice President Tim Goeglein makes the case that marriage is indispensable to societal well-being and provides evidence that cohabitation is socially corrosive. Instead of providing a “starter” version of marriage, living together before taking vows correlates with a significantly higher rate of divorce.
“Couples who wait to live together until they are married (or at the very least engaged) are likely to have a higher respect for the institution of marriage and have some form of religious faith providing moral boundaries,” he writes.
Mr. Goeglein quotes James Q. Wilson, who wrote: “Marriage was once a sacrament. Then it became a contract, and now it is an arrangement.”
“Do you, non-gestating person, take this person with a uterus, to be your gestating partner for as long as you feel like it?”
That is not a marriage made in heaven.
• Robert Knight is a columnist for The Washington Times. His website is roberthknight.com.
Follow the author
Please read our comment policy before commenting.