The Free Press, Mankato, Sept. 10
Hagedorn and the misuse of congressional mail
Two weeks ago, we said Congressman Jim Hagedorn owes his 1st District constituents more details on the print-and-mail scandal that has embroiled his staff.
We knew at the time that the first-term Republican had racked up the highest spending on taxpayer-paid printing and mailing in Congress and had burned through about half of his office budget in the first quarter of the year.
We knew that some of the printing had been contracted to a firm owned by a part-time Hagedorn staffer. The ownership of another company, one incorporated a little more than a year ago and that received the bulk of the work, was unknown.
This week his campaign revealed that that company, Abernathy West, is owned by the brother of Peter Su, then Hagedorn’s chief of staff. Hagedorn fired Su this summer shortly after the expense of his mailing program became public, with the congressman saying that he had “fully delegated” the logistics of his printing and mailing to Su but accepts his own responsibility to monitor and guide his staff’s activities.
Su responded to this week’s development by providing the Star Tribune with an audio recording of an Aug. 7 telephone conversation with Hagedorn in which the congressman declared that there is no ethical issue with funneling hundreds of thousands in taxpayer money to companies connected to his staff.
The “internal review” paid for by Hagedorn’s campaign says there’s nothing illegal with a congressional staff chief hiring his brother and an underling to do the printing work. We’re not conceding that, but set aside for now the question of legality. That same review concedes that Hagedorn’s office paid “significantly” higher rates than other companies charge.
We know the congressman has been dealing with significant health issues. We would give more credence to his delegation explanation had he not been deeply involved in the details of the content of the mailings and had he not told his former top aide that he sees no ethical issues with the spending.
Sum it up: Hagedorn pumped up the volume of his mailings and overpaid, at least in comparison to his congressional peers. Some $460,000 of taxpayer funds were funneled to companies at less than arm’s length. Legal or not, at his direct knowledge or not, the mailing operation was exploited for personal profit.
Congressional office budgets, and the franking program that pays for congressional mail, are not intended to be a means of enriching legislative staff. The district deserves better of its congressman.
___
Star Tribune, Minneapolis, Sept. 9
How many Minnesotans would still be alive?
Nearly 1,900 Minnesotans have died of COVID-19. The U.S. death toll is closing in on 190,000. It is a staggering loss of life, one that surpasses the combined number of American deaths from World War I, the Korean War and the Vietnam War. And the virus is still far from under control, with another 218,000 Americans predicted to die from COVID-19 by January.
How many loved ones would still be with us now had the United States mobilized as soon as its leaders understood this dire viral threat? The nation is compelled to ask that after a new book details the shocking gap between what President Donald Trump knew about this pathogen and his early public pronouncements on it.
The book’s author is one of America’s best-known journalists, Bob Woodward. Along with Carl Bernstein, his reporting for the Washington Post led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon. The tome’s title is “Rage,” and while it won’t be released until Sept. 15, audio recordings have been released and excerpts have been published in the Post.
The account is damning. Instead of warning the American people and taking broad measures that could have saved tens of thousands of lives, Trump downplayed the virus publicly while privately relaying its danger to Woodward. In a taped conversation with Woodward in early February, Trump said he was briefed by top officials on Jan. 28 about the pathogen’s spread in China. Trump also explained how easily the virus spreads.
“You just breathe the air and that’s how it’s passed,” Trump told Woodward on Feb. 7. “And so that’s a very tricky one. That’s a very delicate one. It’s also more deadly than even your strenuous flu. … This is deadly stuff.”
Publicly, Trump compared the virus to the flu, saying it was under control or that it would disappear. Although the Star Tribune Editorial Board published a Feb. 6 warning about the slow development of a COVID test, few others were sounding an alarm. At a Feb. 28 rally, Trump called the virus a “hoax.”
States and individual Americans were left on their own to understand the threat the virus posed, and valuable time was lost. It wasn’t until March 19 that California’s governor ordered a statewide lockdown. New York would follow suit the next day. Minnesota’s stay-at-home order was signed March 25.
Competent national leadership would have urged lockdowns much earlier, along with other vital measures such as securing testing supplies and developing a broad plan for testing. Earlier action also could have boosted supplies of personal protective gear for medical workers and put in place protective policies for senior care centers. The missed opportunities are countless, heartbreaking and infuriating.
Woodward wisely taped his interviews with Trump, so the shopworn “fake news” ploy won’t work here. Neither should another defense - that he didn’t want to cause a panic. Trump did little in the Jan. 28 briefing’s aftermath to contain the threat. In March, he admitted to Woodward that he had deliberately played down COVID’s danger.
Families, businesses and individual Americans continue to suffer as this pandemic continues. Trump’s lack of urgency defies understanding, but the consequences are painfully clear.
___
Please read our comment policy before commenting.