Pacific Alliance Institute (PAI) supports responsible economics in government such as tax cuts, government expenditure reductions and free trade. It is also keenly concerned with China’s covert yet aggressive impulse, and strong protections for private property ownership and religious freedom.
During the Cold War in the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan declared that “the real crisis we face today is a test of moral will and faith.” Japanese Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone sympathized with that vision, saying that he would work to position Japan as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier.”
This vital relationship and shared vision played a role in the collapse of the Soviet Union — the Evil Empire — without a single bullet being fired.
If there had not been bonds between the economic powerhouses of the United States and Japan, the world would have been dominated by communism, and the essential foundations for the flourishing of human civilization — private property ownership and religious freedom — could have perished forever from the modern world.
Today, a similar but even more dangerous menace is creeping up on us again, largely hidden from the public eye. Led by emerging China, along with its client states in Asia, an aggressive and state-sponsored strategic effort is being implemented to infringe on the next generation’s private ownership — especially intellectual property rights and military high technology — and to systematically persecute and eliminate religion.
Unlike totalitarian states during the Cold War that fought fiercely and openly against the Western Bloc, today’s authoritarian states are trying to broaden their influence quietly, using what other observers have called stealth, in darkness, below the threshold of open hostilities.
That is why principled fellows, leaders, organizations, academics and the media of the United States and Japan should stand up with fortitude for freedom in Asia — there is a great need for an enduring commitment to promote the institutions of a free society and vigorously push back against the intolerable violations of international law and human rights. This war is over opposing worldviews and operating systems. In a grand strategy context, a new Commerce Alliance between the United States and Japan is a vital first step to roll back the harmful and immoral behaviors practiced by China.
Hidden Aggressive Impulse of China
“We’re deeply concerned about … the capacity to exert pressure or control over our telecommunications infrastructure … the capacity to maliciously modify or steal information, and … the capacity to conduct undetected espionage.”
This is clearly stated by FBI Director Chris Wray when he was asked about risks associated with Huawei and ZTE being used in the United States before the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing on February 13, 2018.
Huawei was founded in 1987 by Ren Zhengfei, who worked for the information technology research unit of the People’s Liberation Army and joined the Chinese Communist Party in 1978. The U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence revealed in its report that one of the first investors in Huawei had previously affiliated with the government. Later, Mr. Ren was somehow invited to the National Congress of the Communist Party of China in 1982, but Huawei refused to disclose the details to the House Committee.
Although Director Wray put emphasis on “the risks of allowing any company or entity that is beholden to foreign governments that don’t share our values to gain positions of power inside our telecommunications networks,” Huawei failed to deny its connection to the Chinese Communist Party with substantial evidence to the House Committee. The House Committee received a testimony from one of the companies saying “it could not provide internal documentation that was not first approved by the Chinese government.”
In addition to the realm of technology, Chinese capital is also secretly penetrating into real estate. The discussion on CFIUS has often looked at cases where areas surrounding military bases or airports are being bought up by Chinese capital. In Japan, the government has finally acted to authorize its investigation on the usage of areas neighboring the Ministry of Defense, but there have not been any laws enacted to substantially research or restrict general land acquisition with foreign capital.
It is already revealed that Chinese capital bought land around the Japan Self-Defense Forces bases in Hokkaido and Korean capital did the same in Nagasaki. Moreover, water resources and forests are increasingly being acquired by foreign capital that is mainly Chinese. It has reached at least 14,305 acres, according to research that the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries has compiled with incomplete information.
President Reagan discerned “the facts of history and the aggressive impulses of an evil empire,” but the situation is even worse with authoritarian states in the 21st century. They are cunningly veiling their instincts to annihilate liberty.
Private Ownership for the Next Generation
Economic freedom offers the foundation that we can live independently. With this guarantee, everything is basically under one’s responsibility and therefore we can raise our autonomy. We cultivate our integrity by ourselves. What makes exchanging goods and currencies effective here is clarifying ownership of what belongs to whom.
Nowadays, however, the concept of ownership is broadening. Not only goods but services based on proprietary intellectual property are actively being exchanged under the economy of the 21st century.
As a fact, intellectual property rights give international competitiveness to OECD countries, especially the United States and Japan. The balance of charges for the use of intellectual property of the United States ranks in the first place in the world with $79,581,000 in 2017. That of Japan ranks in the second place, with $21,108,000. As same as the financial sector, intellectual property is simply a breadwinner for the United States now.
This means that in addition to sales of products, ideas on how to produce are now the new source of earning. This new environment requires clarity on the ownership of ideas; otherwise, economic freedom of individuals and our autonomy are gradually being eroded.
The problem is that the Commission on the Theft of American Intellectual Property published an update on its original report in 2017 and estimated that “the annual cost to the U.S. economy continues to exceed $225 billion in counterfeit goods, pirated software, and theft of trade secrets and could be as high as $600 billion.”
Especially from China including Hong Kong, 87% of all seized counterfeit goods came in 2015, which is even a little higher than the average of the last five years. Regarding Japan, 64.1% of all victim companies had troubles in China in 2014, according to the research by the Japan Patent Office.
The method adopted by China is being complicated. China has regulations on specific manufacturing industries such as automobile or shipbuilding that foreign companies could not run in China without founding a joint venture with a majority investment by Chinese capital. Exploiting the laws and huge domestic market, counterpart companies of China are forcing technological disclosure on foreign companies. It is often reported that new Chinese companies appear in one year that have the very same technology as the disclosed one.
Moreover, Jen Weedon, the former manager of threat intelligence at FireEye cybersecurity firm, testified before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission that a huge number of proficient hackers sponsored by the government of China are targeting high-tech industries that were strategically identified in the 12th Five Year Plan — especially biopharmaceuticals, robotics, and aviation. This seriously matters even from the perspective of national security.
After President Reagan, successive U.S. presidents hoped freedom could expand in China as it became a major country. But as Vice President Mike Pence proclaimed in October 2018, referring to China’s talk of openness and reform, “Deng Xiaoping’s famous policy now rings hollow.”
The United States and Japan have been plundered by gigantic amounts due to China’s nonpayment of licensing fees as well as currency manipulation, technology transfer requirements in China, and other uneven trade policies. These exploitations bolster the hidden aggressive impulse exposed above — and China is continuing to challenge the international order in the South China Sea.
President Trump recently said ironically: “We rebuilt China.” China’s intentional practice of intellectual property theft rocks the very foundations of individual freedom, entrepreneurship and the rule of established international law. China too often operates with an orientation that is contrary to the moral underpinnings of modern civilization.
The Cross Burned by the Communist Party of China
The Communist Party of China continues to persecute Christianity. The largest underground church, Zion Church, where 1,500 faithful attended every Sunday, has been in Beijing. In September, however, the church was forcibly closed by the authorities and “illegal publicity material” was confiscated.
Such aggressive attacks on faith communities continue throughout China, and local Christians are under pressure to oust their children from certain schools or face a loss of government and community benefits.
Finally, the Communist Party has dabbled in incinerating crosses and bibles in Henan.
Religious freedom, as with private property rights, is the most fundamental human right described in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. As America enshrined in its Declaration of Independence, our greatest strengths are rooted in faith in God, from which inalienable rights flow. In the materialistic regimes, based on communism, the assumption is that human beings who have central power are the ultimate source of limited rights. We can be humble because faith in God is different from communists who believe that human beings can calculate everything.
President Reagan once warned, “I urge you to beware the temptation of pride — the temptation of blithely declaring yourselves above it all and label both sides equally at fault and thereby remov[ing] yourself from the struggle between right and wrong and good and evil.”
Pacific Alliance Institute is repeatedly proposing establishment of CFIUS of Japan to the Japanese government. And with discrete sanctions, WTO reformation, retreat from RCEP and tariffs against China, we could complete the Commerce Alliance with the United States.
We traditional allies should face the contradiction between the two grand strategies over the principle of liberty, in concert.
Regarding Chinese capital infiltrating behind the scenes, in addition to the threat in land security that is pointed to above, M&A is abused to steal industrial secrets. As same as land acquisition, however, Japan currently only obligates foreign capital to submit a prior notification to the government when they invest in Japanese companies that without few specific exceptions.
In order to conserve sovereignty and economic freedom, this system should be immediately replaced with CFIUS of Japan.
It should also not be tolerated that malicious telecommunication companies penetrate in our networks, especially now when we are preparing 5G infrastructure. According to the advice from the Trump Administration, Japan, Europe and Pacific partners need to execute discrete sanctions against those companies.
Immoral trade practices of China also could be rectified through multinational negotiations. The problem is that the current agreement of WTO does not have jurisdiction over such misdeeds. It is also required for us traditional allies not to forget what we value most and to propel the reformation forward.
In that sense, Japan should hesitate and rather retreat from a proposed free trade agreement called the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) that is promoted under China’s vision known as “One Belt, One Road.” It is true that if RCEP is realized, it will have the biggest economic sphere, with a GDP accounting for 30% of the world. However, the standards of freedom and openness are far from enough in RCEP. As the United States prohibited non-market economy countries to negotiate a Free Trade Agreement in the USMCA with Mexico and Canada, Japan will resolutely counter China’s establishing one large economic zone that infringes freedom.
Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC.