PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - Safeway said Tuesday that it is, in fact, subject to taxation under Measure 97 - a reversal of what the company said in a statement last week delivered through the measure’s opponents.
“We had a misunderstanding,” said Jill McGinnis, Oregon spokeswoman for Safeway and Albertsons. She said Albertsons stores, which share a common owner with Safeway, are not subject to the tax.
The Oregonian/OregonLive reported online Tuesday that Safeway and Albertsons were exempt from the tax, a consequence of the unusual way Measure 97 is organized. The initiative proposes a 2.5 percent tax on sales within Oregon over $25 million, but exempts certain types of businesses from the tax.
People were interested in these podcasts
The confusion over Safeway’s tax status underscores another feature of Measure 97, in that it’s not evident to people outside a business whether it is subject to taxation or not.
Measure 97’s tax applies to companies registered as C-corporations, which are often large businesses, but does not affect a “benefit company” or S-corporation, reports The Oregonian/OregonLive (https://bit.ly/2dXTCHW).
There are many distinctions among the various types of companies, and different tax implications for each corporate status. But for our purposes think of it this way:
— C-corps frequently have many investors, like a publicly traded corporation.
— S-corps have few owners. Sometimes that’s a family-owned business, but it can also be a large business controlled by one person or company.
—A “benefit company” is a special category of business under Oregon law, established to create public benefits in addition to profits for the owners.
On Tuesday, McGinnis said Safeway is actually a C-corporation, subject to the tax. But she said Albertsons’ structure is exempt from the tax. Safeway has 94 stores in Oregon; Albertsons has 31.
McGinnis acknowledged that Safeway and Albertsons had signed off on the incorrect statement from Measure 97’s opponents regarding their status.
Safeway and Albertsons have contributed $1.8 million to the “No” campaign fighting Measure 97, as much as any other business.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.