Former Majority Leader Tom DeLay and former Speaker Newt Gingrich, leaders of the 1994 Republican-led revolution that swept through Congress, agree that America needs to fight radical Islamism — but neither were enthusiastic about the idea of President Obama leading the charge.
Their comments came in context of answering a videotaped question from The Washington Times: Do you support the House bill that passed that arms and trains Syrian rebels to fight Islamic State terrorists?
Mr. Gingrich, who represented Georgia from 1979 to 1999, called the vote a “first step toward confronting evil,” in the video. But more action will be needed, he went on.
People were interested in these podcasts
“I think we have no choice except to ultimately defeat radical Islamism. I think it is totally inadequate,” he said of the House vote. “But I think it is the first step, in the right direction. There will be many more steps. It doesn’t mean it has to be American forces on the ground. We need a new strategy for combat forces where we basically pay for other people, not ourselves. But we can get there. This was a step in that direction,” Mr. Gingrich said.
Mr. DeLay, meanwhile, said in a separate interview that his support for the House vote — which authorizes funding to train and arm Syrian rebels to fight the Islamic State — is tempered by his distrust of the president.
“I’m sort of torn between understanding that we’re in a war on terror, that there’s all kinds of groups, including ISIS, that we have to go after, and destroy, but at the same time I don’t trust this president to do the right thing. So I’m hoping that saner heads will prevail and I was hoping for a resolution that was an expression of the American people — what they want to see done — contrary to what the president seems not to be doing.”
Contact the author
Please read our comment policy before commenting.