- Associated Press
Sunday, July 3, 2011

BANGKOK (AP) — The sister of exiled former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra led Thailand’s main opposition party to a landslide victory in elections Sunday, heralding an extraordinary political turnaround five tumultuous years after her fugitive billionaire brother was toppled in an army coup.

The vote paves the way for 44-year-old Yingluck Shinawatra, who has never held office, to become this Southeast Asian kingdom’s first female prime minister.

A large mandate to govern could help the new government navigate a way out of the crisis that has plagued Thailand since Mr. Thaksin’s 2006 overthrow, but the question remains whether the nation’s elite power brokers, including the monarchy and the army, will accept the result.

Mr. Thaksin was barred from politics in 2007 and convicted on graft charges the next year. The U.S.-educated Ms. Yingluck, whom he has called “my clone,” is widely considered his proxy.

The incumbent premier, Abhisit Vejjajiva, conceded defeat Sunday night and said he was ready to become the opposition.

With 98 percent of the vote counted, preliminary results from the Election Commission indicated Ms. Yingluck’s Pheu Thai party had a strong lead with 264 of 500 parliament seats, well over the majority needed to form a government. Mr. Abhisit’s Democrats won 160 seats.

Speaking to a throng of cheering supporters at her party headquarters in Bangkok, Ms. Yingluck declined to declare victory until final results are released. But she said: “I don’t want to say that Pheu Thai wins today. It’s a victory of the people.”

In an interview broadcast on the Thai PBS television station, Mr. Thaksin called the preliminary results “a step forward.”

“People are tired of a standstill,” he said from the desert emirate of Dubai, where he lives in exile to avoid a two-year prison sentence for graft he says is politically motivated. “They want to see change in a peaceful manner.”

Mr. Thaksin said he did not feel vengeful and was “ready to forgive all.”

The army toppled Mr. Thaksin in 2006, and controversial court rulings removed two of the pro-Thaksin premiers who followed, one of whom won elections intended to restore democracy in 2007. That chain of events paved the way for army-backed Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva to assume power — ultimately sparking the massive anti-government protests last year that brought Bangkok to its knees, leaving 90 people dead, 1,800 wounded and the glittering city’s skyline engulfed in flames.

Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha, the army chief, reiterated his vow last week to stay neutral in the vote, dismissing rumors the military would stage another coup.

“The future depends on whether the traditional elite will be willing to accept the voice of the people,” Pavin Chachavalpongpun of the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore, told the Associated Press.

The more Ms. Yingluck’s party wins by, he said, “the more stable her government will be, the more difficult it will be for the elite to do anything against it.”

Buranaj Smutharaks, a spokesman for Mr. Abhisit’s ruling Democrat party, issued a statement saying simply, “We believe all sides will respect the results.”

Two exit polls were released after polls closed at 3 p.m.

One, the Suan Dusit University poll, gave Pheu Thai, Ms. Yingluck’s party, 313 of 500 parliament seats, compared with 152 seats for Mr. Abhisit’s Democrat party. Another poll by Bangkok’s Assumption University gave Pheu Thai 299 seats compared to 132 for the Democrats.

Pheu Thai needed more than 250 seats to form a government without help from smaller parties.

The photogenic Ms. Yingluck long has been seen as the front-runner in the vote. Her popularity is almost entirely due to fact that she is the proxy of Mr. Thaksin, who has been legally barred from politics after his conviction on corruption.

His ascent to power in 2001 changed Thailand forever, touching off a societal schism between the country’s haves and long-silent have-nots. The marginalized rural poor hail his populism, while the elite establishment sees him as a corrupt, autocratic threat to the status quo and even to the revered constitutional monarchy.

That schism has played out through pro- and anti-Thaksin street protests since the 2006 coup. The vote, many believe, is largely about the divisive legacy he left behind.

For a nation of 66 million people known to tourists as “the Land of Smiles,” much is at stake.

Last year’s demonstrations marked some of the nation’s worst violence in two decades and left Thailand’s reputation for stability in tatters. Holding the ballot was one of the protesters demands, though they wanted it held last year.

Oxford-educated Mr. Abhisit used his campaign to blame the opposition and its supporters for burning Bangkok last year, saying a vote for Ms. Yingluck would be a vote for chaos. He also declared the poll “the best opportunity to remove the poison of Thaksin from Thailand.”

Mr. Abhisit and his allies believe Ms. Yingluck is plotting Mr. Thaksin’s return through a proposed amnesty that would apply for political crimes committed since the coup. Ms. Yingluck says it is aimed at reconciling all Thais, not just her brother.

Mr. Thaksin has vowed to return by year’s end, but he said Sunday that “I have to be part of the solution … I don’t want to return and create problems. If that’s the case, I don’t have to go back yet.”

Sunai Phasuk, a senior researcher for Human Rights Watch, said the most important challenge facing the incoming government will be resolving the nation’s divide.

“Everyone is talking about political deals, but no one is talking about how to end impunity, restore freedom of expression and hold perpetrators accountable no matter how high up they are,” Mr. Sunai said. “Without that, Thailand will never able to get out of this cycle of violence and turn itself around.”

Although Mr. Thaksin is credited for awakening what has become a democratic movement among the country’s marginalized poor who long stood silent, his opponents say he is no champion of freedom. During his time in office, Mr. Thaksin was loudly criticized for a sharp authoritarian streak and stood accused of corruption, cronyism and abuse of power.

Associated Press writers Grant Peck and Sinfah Tunsarawuth contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC.