OPINION:
A little more than a year into the new Democratic Congress, a powerful committee chairman has fallen victim to what his party once called Capitol Hill’s “culture of corruption.”
Democrats regained control of Congress by tagging Republicans with that accusation, but they aren’t using that term anymore because they fear, with much justification, that voters will think they’re talking about their own party, whose damaged reputation is growing worse by the week.
It was the latest in a series of embarrassing episodes that have plagued Democrats over the past year as they have struggled to get control of an agenda that is dead, dying or on life-support systems.
New York Rep. Charles B. Rangel lost the chairmanship of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee last week, 24 hours after he said “you bet your life” he would hold onto the plum post despite a long list of troubling congressional investigations into unethical and possibly illegal activities, such as not paying his taxes.
His troubles have been the stuff of unending newspaper headlines that Democratic leaders concluded have badly damaged their party as it enters a brutal midterm election season when Republicans are expected to make big gains in House seats.
One can only surmise that Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her leadership colleagues told Mr. Rangel he either had to step down for the good of the party or face a pending Republican resolution that had enough bipartisan support to remove him from the chairmanship.
The House ethics committee has been digging into his case for a long time. It recently ruled that he improperly accepted trips to the Caribbean from major corporations, but that was the least of Mr. Rangel’s troubles.
Ethics committee investigators also were probing charges he had failed to pay taxes on a villa he owns in the Dominican Republic and that he improperly used a rent-controlled apartment for his political committees, used his House office to seek donations for a wing named in his honor at a New York college and revised his financial disclosure forms to show he had more than half-a-million dollars in previously unreported wealth.
The venerable 79-year-old, 20-term lawmaker said he was stepping aside temporarily by taking a “leave of absence” until the ethics panel has completed its investigations. Most congressional insiders, however, believe he will never regain the chairmanship.
That led to a brief generational struggle over who would take the helm of a pivotal committee with oversight of taxation and health care.
It wasn’t going to be next-in-line Rep. Pete Stark of California, 78, an archleftist who has a replantation for making intemperate remarks and fighting with his colleagues. Mr. Stark, who has been fighting an undisclosed illness for more than a year, bowed out of contention Thursday.
That cleared the way for Mrs. Pelosi to name liberal Rep. Sander M. Levin of Michigan, the third-ranking Democrat, who has a close relationship with Mr. Rangel. “At this point, I’m acting chairman,” Mr. Levin said Thursday.
But the ethical and political problems plaguing House Democrats are only part of their party’s growing troubles on health care, a weak and jobless recovery, spooked financial markets worried about draconian tax increases and job-killing business regulations, uncontrolled spending and a meteoric $14 trillion debt that threatens America’s global credit rating.
Reports of bitter political infighting and deep dissension within President Obama’s White House high command also cloud the Democrats’ efforts to show that they can govern.
At the heart of Mr. Obama’s troubles are stories surfacing that suggest his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, is complaining to his former colleagues in the House about Mr. Obama’s dubious decision-making abilities.
Washington is abuzz over Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank’s story that said, “Obama’s first year fell apart in large part because he didn’t follow his chief of staff’s advice on crucial matters. Arguably, Emanuel is the only person keeping Obama from becoming Jimmy Carter.”
Some in the White House urged Mr. Obama to agree to a scaled-back, bipartisan package of health care reforms as a first step. But the president, in a roll of the dice, wants an up-or-down vote on the unpopular Senate bill, a political gamble that many vulnerable Democrats in the House aren’t willing to take.
Moreover, the downward trajectory on Mr. Obama’s numbers seems to be gathering speed. A recent survey by Republican pollster Bill McInturff finds that the president’s job-approval score among independents (the voters who elected him) has dropped from 56 percent in mid-2009 to 44 percent today.
Mr. McInturff points to Mr. Obama’s stubborn refusal to change his direction on health care as a key reason behind the decline.
In the meantime, Mrs. Pelosi struggles to find enough Democratic votes to pass the president’s last-ditch plan, with desertions mounting weekly.
Donald Lambro is a nationally syndicated columnist.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.